首页> 外文OA文献 >Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with Treponema pallidum or axial filament of T phagedenis biotype Reiter as antigen: evaluation as screening tests for syphilis.
【2h】

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with Treponema pallidum or axial filament of T phagedenis biotype Reiter as antigen: evaluation as screening tests for syphilis.

机译:以苍白密螺旋体或pha phagedenis生物型Reiter的轴向丝作为抗原的酶联免疫吸附测定:评估为梅毒筛查试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with an ultrasonicate of Treponema pallidum (TP-ELISA) or axial filament of Treponema phagedenis biotype Reiter (AF-ELISA) were developed to detect treponemal antibody. TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were compared with the T pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA), the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed (FTA-ABS) test, and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test for sensitivity and specificity of serodiagnosis of syphilis. A total of 1423 serum samples, 253 from patients with various stages of syphilis, 500 from patients attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic, and 670 from people without syphilis, were investigated. At all stages of syphilis the sensitivity of the TP-ELISA, the AF-ELISA, the TPHA, and the FTA-ABS test did not differ significantly, except that the AF-ELISA was less sensitive than the TPHA (p less than 0.05) for treated syphilis. In primary syphilis, neurosyphilis, and treated syphilis the TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were significantly more sensitive than the VDRL test (p less than 0.05). The specificity of all tests was comparable (p greater than 0.05). The TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA appear to be good alternatives to the TPHA as screening tests for syphilis. Because of the easy availability of a well defined antigen the AF-ELISA seems to be better suited for large scale testing.
机译:开发了一种酶联免疫吸附测定法,该方法利用了梅毒螺旋体(TP-ELISA)或噬菌密螺旋体生物型Reiter的轴向细丝(AF-ELISA)进行超声检测,以检测螺旋体抗体。 TP-ELISA和AF-ELISA与梅毒T血细胞凝集测定(TPHA),荧光性肾小球体抗体吸附(FTA-ABS)测试和性病研究实验室(VDRL)测试比较梅毒血清学诊断的敏感性和特异性。共调查了1423份血清样本,其中253份来自梅毒各个阶段的患者,500份来自性传播疾病(STD)诊所的患者,670份来自无梅毒的患者。在梅毒的所有阶段,TP-ELISA,AF-ELISA,TPHA和FTA-ABS测试的敏感性没有显着差异,只是AF-ELISA的敏感性低于TPHA(p小于0.05)治疗梅毒。在原发性梅毒,神经梅毒和治疗过的梅毒中,TP-ELISA和AF-ELISA的敏感性明显高于VDRL测试(p小于0.05)。所有测试的特异性均具有可比性(p大于0.05)。 TP-ELISA和AF-ELISA在梅毒筛查试验中似乎是TPHA的良好替代品。由于容易获得明确定义的抗原,AF-ELISA似乎更适合大规模测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号